|
County Tries to Raid Open Space Funds...AGAIN |
|
MESSAGE FROM ABCO
The Suffolk County Legislature continues to play with our tax money...funding that was approved through a voter referendum is once again on the radar. This legislature has tried before to direct funds to other budget lines...clearly in violation of the terms of the voter referendum. Late last year they even tried to allocate these funds for use in the general budget...in order to help close the budget gap that they themselves created. ABCO stood up then and publicly opposed the attempt, several environmental groups filed a lawsuit to halt the illegal diversion of open space clean water funds. Still here we are once again and the County Legislature is making noise about stopping all future land preservation purchases because of the economy. Even threatening a MORATORIUM ON PLANNING STEPS RESOLUTIONS. These funds are DEDICATED FUNDS and are not impacted by any shortfalls in the County's budget...in fact.they simply CANNOT be used for any other purpose without a new voter referendum authorizing some other purpose that would permit such a diversion. Why is it everyone else understands basic economics and our County Legislators simply don't? When prices are low..we should be buying not waiting for them to rise again! There are not many benefits to this recession, but one of them is the opportunity to buy more land for less money. Because of the sharp decline in real estate prices...not likely to ever be much lower...NOW is the best time to make wise and important purchases. These short-sighted politicians just don't get it. ABCO will continue to work with many other environmental and civic groups to get our elected representatives to not only live up to their word to protect our waters and open spaces, but to abide by the LAW and the will of the voters ...who overwhelmingly passed the referendum in Suffolk County Tell them that only the voters can change that. We ask that you take a moment to write or call your Legislator about this very important situation. We'll keep you posted, but we need you to take action now and let your Legislator know that the Open Space funds are not their money to spend as they wish! Please write, e-mail or call the County Legislature to voice your opposition to their handling of your tax money and their endless attempts to use funds exclusively authorized by the voters for continued protections for our water and to preserve what is left of our farms and open spaces. Thank you for your strong support.
|
|
ABCO Elections - Nominating Committee |
|
To: All Member Organizations From: ABCO Nominating Committee Sharon Wiesmann; Pat Seubert; Ray Keenan Date: January 31, 2012 Re: ABCO Elections 2012 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Available positions (two-year terms): President; First Vice President; Second Vice President; Treasurer; Corresponding Secretary; Recording Secretary; Director; Director; Director. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nominations and Procedures The nominating committee will present their slate of nominees for officers at the February meeting. Art. IX, Sec. 3. Nominations from the floor will be accepted only at the March meeting and must be seconded by a member in good standing. Any person so nominated must also be in good standing, present, and agree to accept the nomination. Art. IX, Sec. 4. Elections will be held at the March meeting, at which time the election will be conducted by closed ballot and voting limited to voting member associations in good standing as described above. Art. IX, Sec. 5. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eligibility Only Delegates or members from voting organizations in good standing may serve as an elected officer of the organization. Article V, Sec 3. A member organization shall be considered to be in good standing when: (1) All annual dues are paid and current; (2) An association delegate(s) or representative has attended 50% of the regularly scheduled and held monthly general meetings; (3) At least one delegate has been in attendance at the general meeting for at least 50% of the meeting time or one hour and 15 minutes. Article III, Sec. 7. |
|
BRT Freight Train Derails |
BRT Locomotive Derails - LIRR on track February 3, 2012 by JOHN VALENTI /
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
 A derailment of a New York & Atlantic Railway freight locomotive in Wyandanch caused a temporary suspension of service on the Long Island Rail Road's Ronkonkoma branch early Friday, officials said. However, morning rush-hour service was not affected by the incident despite initial concerns it might be, LIRR spokesman Aaron Donovan said. The NY&AR is a short line railroad with exclusive rights to haul freight on Long Island using LIRR tracks. Its diesel freight engine suffered a partial derailment on a siding near the Wyandanch station just after midnight, Donovan said. Donovan said the incident forced a suspension of LIRR service on the Ronkonkoma branch until 2:45 a.m., when service was restored with speed restrictions in place. All service was back to normal by 5:40 a.m., Donovan said. Two eastbound trains were terminated at Farmingdale due to the incident, with customers routed onto buses for all local service to Ronkonkoma. Two westbound trains were terminated at Brentwood, with customers routed onto buses for local service to Hicksville. After service was restored, Donovan said two trains were delayed due to congestion. One eastbound train was delayed 13 minutes, a westbound train delayed 17 minutes. Donovan said the diesel engine leaked fuel after the derailment but said an environmental clean-up crew was called in to deal with the leak. No one was injured in the incident. The cause remains under investigation. |
|
State probes alleged mining at farm site January 29, 2012 by PATRICK WHITTLE /
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
The state Department of Environmental Conservation is investigating the developers of a planned Yaphank fish farm for allegedly mining more than 90,000 cubic yards of sand and dirt without a state permit. The builders of Blue Green Farms, which has broken ground off Horseblock Road, deny having done any mining and say they have been preparing the site for greenhouses. They were cited for unpermitted mining and issued a stop-work order in December 2010, DEC officials said. The developer responded that the work was exempt under state agricultural law, DEC officials said. DEC investigators are looking into whether Blue Green Farm's claim is correct -- and whether the firm violated a stop work order after the first citation, said DEC spokesman Bill Fonda. The agency is attempting to resolve the matter with Blue Green Farms, which could receive a fine or other punishment, Fonda said. Fonda said it appears "when the stop work order was issued, they had only taken out a certain amount, and they continued to take it out." But the project's backers say the farm -- which is slated to grow tomatoes and raise sturgeon and striped bass -- has not engaged in mining. The Yaphank-based company, which is owned by a group of local investors led by Leonard Shore, has done grading and site preparation, but not mining, said spokeswoman Judy White. The work, which has included moving sand and dirt, is essential so the company can build 400,000 square feet of greenhouse space required for the project, she said. "Blue Green Farms is currently undergoing site preparation for the greenhouses," White said. Fonda said the DEC considers an activity a mine if it involves excavating more than 750 cubic yards of materials in 12 months. On a recent weekday, bulldozers were working the site, where piles of sand and dirt towered above a crater in the ground. The project has polarized civic activists. Some see it as a chance for sustainable farming onLong Island and others think it is an excuse to mine and sell sand. White declined to comment on whether the company plans to sell the materials it excavates. Blue Green Farms has launched the $35 million, 12-acre first phase of the project, a hydroponic farm. In early summer, workers plan to install 2,400 pilings that will be part of the foundation of the project, White said. The facility, which totals 56 acres, is expected to expand in 2013 to include an aquaculture facility that will raise fish, company representatives have said. Johan McConnell, president of the South Yaphank Civic Association, defended the operation. She said the company has "spent a tremendous amount of money" that it would never recoup by selling sand, and the farm is "just another form of farming." But MaryAnn Johnston, president of the Affiliated Brookhaven Civic Organization, chided the state for overlooking DEC concerns and awarding the project a $517,000 grant in recent months. She said that money could have gone to Long Island's working fishermen. "What are we saying to our fishermen?" she said.
|
|
|
BlueGreen Farm cited by DEC |
|
Blue Green Farms cited for sand· mining Civics call for closer environmental look By PEGGY SPELLMAN HOEY The developers of Blue Green Farms have been cited by the state Department of Environmental Conservation for violating sand mining regulations at their Yaphank location planned for a hydroponic farm and fish hatchery. DEC spokesman Bill Fonda said investigators issued a notice of violation in December after Blue Green Farms reported removing about 90,000 cubic yards of material. Regulations require a mining permit for developers who remove over 750 cubic yards of sand over a 12-month period, Fonda said. As part of the permitting process, the developer would be required to submit a mined land reclamation plan, a reclamation bond and pay regulatory fees to the DEC, according to Fonda. Blue Green Farms spokeswoman Judy White, of CJ2 Communications in Greenlawn, referred questions about the project to the land use attorney handling the case, Michael Cox, of the Weber Law Group based in Melville. Cox was not available for comment by deadline. Fonda said the developers are going under the assumption the sand removal is protected under an agricultural exemption that was granted by the Town of Brookhaven. "I think they believe the town has given that to them, but it comes from the DEC," he said. Fonda said DEC officials are meeting with Blue Green Farms Friday to discuss the matter. Blue Green Farms could be fined for the mining, if it cannot be proven the project qualifies under a state agricultural exemption. The Blue Green Farms' developers, who include Leonard Shore of Hauppauge, plan a 12-acre hydroponic farm just south of Horseblock Road. Although vegetables will be the main focus of the farm, a fish hatchery, featuring tilapia, sturgeon and striped bass, will be added in 2013. Fish waste will then be used as fertilizer for the vegetables. Shore said the project should be exempt, not only for agricultural reasons, but for construction reasons, because the sand had to be removed in order for the project to be built and the purpose of its removal was not just for sale. “We are exempt -the DEC really has no business being there," he said. Affiliated Brookhaven Civic Organization president MaryAnn Johnston questioned if there was a proper environmental review and why Blue Green Farms' devel opers are allowed to continue hauling sand away after they were told to stop· in December. "The message to me is that our bays, streams and surface waters are so bad that the state is not investing in our fishermen, · but in this aquaculture," she said. "Why are we putting money into an on-land fish farm instead of supporting the industry already in place?'' Sharon Wiesmann, treasurer of the Yaphank Taxpayers and Civic Association, said residents are concerned with the sand removal and also questioned whether the project was reviewed properly. Wiesmann said the group has taken up the position that they are keeping a watchful eye on the project, given its close proximity to others nearby. "There is ample apprehension from the residents of our community that have not been adequately addressed by the Town of Brookhaven, not the least of which is whether this project and the excavating required for the fish pools presents unique circumstances that will have a significant environmental impact to the Carmans River Watershed," the group said in a one-page statement blasting Blue Green Farms. "We question the judiciousness of the town to consider this project to be exempt under the state and town agricultural laws by not requiring a hard look under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. The town [planning department], who initially stated that the Yaphank location would not necessitate sand mining, has been asleep at the wheel with their eyes closed." Johan McConnell, president of the South Yaphank Civic Association, supported the project, saying she “loves the project" because it has a much smaller footprint then that of other projects and will be able to produce the equivalent of 200 acres of vegetables on 20 acres. She rejected any claims the developer is conducting illegal sand mining at the location because she has never seen it taking place during the many times she has toured the site. Any sand that was pulled out was done so to make the ground level so the greenhouses could be installed. "It's really tough to put a greenhouse on a piece of land with a big slant," she said. As far as the fishermen are concerned, McConnell said: "If this posed a problem for the fishermen, I’m sure he would be able to make accommodations," she said. • |
|
|
Compost linked to Contamination |
 http://www.newsday.com/long-island/suffolk/compost-facilities-eyed-after-water-tests-1.3500679 Compost facilities eyed after water tests February 2, 2012 by MARK HARRINGTON /
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
 Photo credit: Newsday/Daniel Goodrich | Ed Warner, the manager of Long Island Compost in Yaphank stands on top of a large pile of compost. (June 8, 2006) Preliminary findings from a yearlong probe of groundwater contamination at compost and mulch facilities in and around Yaphank are leading regulators to rethink rules that govern all organic-waste facilities in New York, a top state environmental official said. The review, which follows years of complaints by residents, could result in new controls on water runoff and air quality, tighter management of compost and mulch piles, and closer monitoring of the materials that go into them. Peter Scully, regional director of the state Department of Environmental Conservation, said in an interview that investigators have narrowed the source of the contamination at the largest site, which includes elevated levels of radioactivity and manganese levels well beyond drinking water standards, to activity at the Long Island Compost facility on Horseblock Road. Since 2009, teams of health workers have surrounded the 62-acre facility in Yaphank with test wells. Similarly high levels of manganese were found at an unrelated mulching facility on Main Street in Yaphank, Scully said, and at a site in East Moriches that Long Island Compost vacated a decade ago. "It [all] appears to be linked to vegetative waste generally," he said, and not specifically to the practices of any one company. Health officials say the level of radioactivity generally is below drinking water standards. And while manganese at the levels shown can be a health problem, the water is no longer being consumed, so officials don't believe there are any current health risks. Neighboring homes all have been connected to the public water system. DEC seeks broader authority The possibility of new rules for compost come as the DEC is reviewing waste management regulations statewide. Any changes can be instituted on the order of the DEC commissioner without the need for legislation. The DEC is "actively pursuing modifications to existing regulations" that would give it "much broader authority" of organic waste management statewide, Scully said. "Public health, as always, is the primary concern." Scully suggested that new rules won't come quickly. "It's a significant public process," he said. The report, in draft form, has not been publicly released. In addition to considering the use of impermeable barriers beneath compost and mulch piles, Scully said other changes under consideration include the use of paved roadways at facilities to cut dust and groundwater contamination; "enhanced" record keeping of truck traffic into and out of facilities; the need for water-resistant covers on top of compost piles to allow them to divert water; and better management of pile size. Charles Vigliotti, president of Long Island Compost, said the company already complies with state standards for organic waste recycling and will comply with any new ones. "There is a plan in place with standards," he said. "If those standards should change, Long Island Compost will comply with them. We're interested in a dialogue to find out the ramification of changes they may make." Groundwater concerns are the latest in a series of issues neighbors have raised with Long Island Compost since it began operations in Yaphank in 2000, when the company moved from East Moriches at Brookhaven's request. Odor and dust complaints from neighbors persist, several residents said last month -- even after the DEC ordered the company to enclose transfer station operations last October. The company has appealed that order. Vigliotti said the company itself is developing a series of "very concrete" operational improvements to address the problems, but he declined to disclose them until they are worked out with state regulators. Public officials say issues of groundwater contamination aren't evident in the compost they've tested, and Vigliotti vouched for his products, which are marketed in retail stores under the Long Island Compost, Hamptons Estate and Great Gardens brands. "We are as concerned about environmental contamination as anyone," he said. "We're using these products, too. My children garden with our products." He said Long Island Compost is "100 percent safe." A chemical reaction Composting has been considered an ecologically friendly form of waste management, and dozens of local municipalities rely on Long Island Compost and others to handle massive organic waste streams. But tougher regulations that apply to landfills, such as ground barriers to prevent wastewater water leaching, don't cover composting facilities. On Long Island, long compost windrows are generally placed on open ground. The concern: Over long periods, elements in the compost may concentrate as they leach directly into topsoil, perhaps even altering the chemical composition of previously undisturbed earth. For Donna Horton, whose family lives beside the Long Island Compost facility, the result was years of tainted water -- until Brookhaven Town paid for a city-water hookup last May. "It was kind of yellow and toward the end it had suds in it," she said of her tap water. "It smelled like sulfur, and the dishes, the shower, everything just turned brown. It was really just disgusting." Water drawn around the Horton home showed manganese levels above 25,000 parts per billion -- well above the drinking water standard of 300 parts per billion. |
|
|
|